IMDb >
The Wolf Man (2009)
Watch It
Buy it at Amazon
Rent it at
blockbuster.com
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
blockbuster.com
BETA
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsThe Wolf Man (2009) More at IMDbPro »
| Photos (see all 10 | slideshow) |
         |
Overview
Release Date:
6 November 2009 (USA) morePlot:
Upon his return to his ancestral homeland, an American man (Del Toro) is bitten, and subsequently cursed by, a werewolf. full summary | add synopsisPlot Keywords:
moreNewsDesk:
(144 articles)
Tracking Shot July 2009: The Fighter, Your Highness and Vengeance: A Love Story (From ioncinema. 1 July 2009)
American Werewolf in London Remake in Development?
(From FilmJunk. 29 June 2009, 7:54 AM, PDT)
User Comments:
Fun, Gory, A Little Uneven moreProduction Notes from IMDbPro
Status:
Post-production | See complete list of 12,000 in-production titles »Status Updated:
30 December 2008Note:
Because this project is categorized as being in production, the data is subject to change; some data could be removed completely.Cast
 | Hugo Weaving | ... | Det. Aberline |
 | Emily Blunt | ... | Gwen Conliffe |
 | Benicio Del Toro | ... | Lawrence Talbot |
 | Anthony Hopkins | ... | Sir John Talbot |
| Geraldine Chaplin | ... | Maleva |
 | Kiran Shah | ... | Wolfboy |
| Art Malik | ... | Singh |
| Michael Cronin | ... | Dr. Lloyd |
 | Elizabeth Croft | ... | Ophelia |
| Nicholas Day | ... | Colonel Montford |
 | Sam Hazeldine | ... | Horatio |
 | David Sterne | ... | Kirk |
| Olga Fedori | ... | Maleva's daughter |
 | Branko Tomovic | ... | Gypsy Man |
| Bridgette Millar | ... | Gertrude |
 | Anthony Debaeck | ... | Driver |
 | Richard James | ... | Doctor #2 |
| Emily Parr | ... | Prostitute |
| Cristina Contes | ... | Solana Talbot |
| Andy Gathergood | ... | Villager 1 |
Additional Details
Parents Guide:
Add content advisory for parentsLanguage:
EnglishColor:
ColorFun Stuff
FAQ
What will be the MPAA rating?In what year does the story take place?
Why did the original director quit the project?
more
more
Message Boards
Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for The Wolf Man (2009) moreRecommendations
If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
Show more recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
| An American Werewolf in London | The Wolf Man | The Hound of the Baskervilles | The World Is Not Enough | The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe |
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
Related Links
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | News articles |
| IMDb Horror section | IMDb UK section | Add this title to MyMovies |
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
The Wolfman is a very earnest remake, with few of the self-conscious conceits of modern horror movies. Which is both good and bad. As a period piece, it enables us to watch without inserting a lot of our own biases and preconceptions on the story and characters. However, anything that does remind us of our own lives then pulls at the suspension of disbelief necessary to watch a film based on the supernatural.
Such things as Benicio Del Toro's accent. The story about an English kid sent to live in America would naturally make the audience pay attention to the way he talks, and when you scrutinize Del Toro's speech, you realize he gets about a B+ on accent, but this still leaves about 10% of the familiar actor you know. Or Anthony Hopkins' history. This is a guy whose most familiar role is a psychopathic cannibal; any nods to that in a movie about characters who lose control and eat humans are jarring.
The film is really well acted, and the story, while predictable, is well-told, with plenty of suspense, and empathetic characters. I could have done with a little lighter hand on the stuff that was meant to be suspenseful. There are no literal cat scares, but we get bird scares and dog scares and plenty of stuff put in to make us jump because of loud sound editing. The gore is amped up to eleven, with very graphic maulings, disembowelings, and beheadings, showing just about every way a body part can be damaged and/or severed by a set of claws and/or fangs.
A theme touched on briefly in the film is the question of whether lycanthropy is all in the brain. When we first meet Hugo Weaving's character, we learn he had previously investigated "The Ripper," and is convinced the crimes he is now investigating are similar. This is mentioned, then forgotten. I would have loved more of this, which would have meant more of Hugo Weaving, which is never a bad thing. When Del Toro's character is captured and sent to the asylum, his "doctors" are convinced he is a psycho, that he believes he's a werewolf but is really just a maniac whose delusions are triggered by the moon. This would have been a very interesting angle to pursue; if the audience was left with a question of exactly how much control a werewolf might have over its actions, how much man is left inside a wolf-man? A third instance of this is the 'origin' backstory; the first character to be infected with the wolf virus, as it were, has much more choice in the matter, and much more fault, and it could have been very interesting to see the character struggle with the blame for subsequent events. Even if it didn't fit in the current story line, it would have made for a richer backstory, and richer character development.
As it is, it's a story you've seen before, but still a good, very watchable, typical horror movie.