IMDb user comments for
Tarnation (2003) More at IMDbPro »

Filter:

Best Chronological Prolific Authors Loved It Hated It Hide Spoilers:

Page 1 of 11:

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]

Index

108 comments in total

---

63 out of 83 people found the following comment useful :-
please read this.., 20 November 2004

Author: gottkvold

I thought this movie was a masterpiece and something a lot of people really should see. I disagree with what some of the other people have been saying on this, because you don't need to identify with this movie. Its not meant to only effect people who have mentally ill parents or are homosexual. A movie doesn't have to be suited to you for you to enjoy it, that's a really selfish thing to say. The fact that someone is showing what its like using their own life in complete truth is amazing. (to some of the people who commented): stop criticizing everything that isn't perfect and not as entertaining as you wanted it to be and try and learn something from it. It seems like no one can just once put themselves in someone else's shoes and see what their lives are like without complaining and being disgusted. Try to be more open minded and give something a chance without prejudice. Its just like if you do something and the whole time your saying in your head how much you hate it, your obviously not going to like it.

I don't really care though, because I really liked it. It just makes me mad when people can just trash such hard work. So what, the movie was upsetting, you didn't have to actually be put through it, why are you complaining.

In contrast I think the movie was very uplifting how it turned out. Although I can agree that its not something you would watch if you just want to be entertained, but its still worth watching and I can guaranty that if you see it with good expectations, you'll like it. It was an extremely interesting film and also very much original. I definitely recommend it to anyone that is interested in psychology. The movie itself is very well shot and has great sound and music. Again, I think most people will be happy they saw it and please disregard what others say (and what I say). See it and decide for yourself.

---

68 out of 106 people found the following comment useful :-
A psychedelic "Better Than Chocolate"--and as trite., 3 November 2004
Author: crackleanddrag from Texas

A $200-some-odd initial budget is no excuse for a dull, self-indulgent film that offers little or no insight into either a young man's life or his times.

I was initially drawn to the film by both the subject matter and the fact that John Cameron Mitchell (creator of "Hedwig and the Angry Inch") was an executive producer. After seeing "Hedwig," I trusted Mitchell's artistic judgment completely---only to guess after seeing "Tarnation" that Mitchell must have been swayed by some sort of internal "pay it forward" guilt-trip to professionally help out a fellow young-ish gay filmmaker. (Disclaimer: I'm gay myself and very much appreciate gay or gender-bending film-making---when it's well done. This film, though, was like a psychedelic version of the incredibly gooey "Better Than Chocolate"---as in "I'm a sensitive gay person and I've been through a lot---love me!" Ick.)

Director/star Caouette apparently had about 15 minutes-worth of interesting home-video footage of himself as a child growing up with his once-institutionalized mother and oddball grandparents. And a few minutes of vanity shots of himself as a teenager with friends and as an adult with his boyfriend. The rest of the movie consists primarily of long, drawn-out filler---pseudo-freaky graphics and music superimposed over photos of Caouette posing. Not to mention the subtitles, especially at the beginning, that take 20 frames to relay a bit of information when they could have taken 2 or 3. (I read other reviews here before posting this; someone wrote that he/she saw people in the theater walking out during the first 10 minutes, and that they must have been either gay-intolerant or unfamiliar with non-mainstream film-making...My own guess is that they must have just been extremely bored with the by-now-clichéd MTV-style video sequence.)

Caouette's mother's story is truly tragic. Her own parents are tragic. Caouette's abusive upbringing in foster homes is tragic. But I know this only intellectually from the film, via the facts presented in the subtitles. Caouette isn't able to evoke an actual sense of pathos or understanding with either his photographs or his video interviews. How, for instance, did he escape the bizarre family cycle? Like Caouette, I also began hanging out in area punk clubs as a teen... It was an extremely visceral, life-changing feeling of acceptance for me. And for Caouette? He met a boyfriend. And a couple of club friends. You see a couple of bland photographs of them and maybe a minute of video of the guys mugging for the camera. Nothing else to give anyone viewing a sense of either the era or for what Caouette himself was feeling.

Then he moves to New York City. There, Cute Boyfriend David is very understanding and hugs Jonathan whenever he gets a (video-recorded) call from his weird mother. The two frolic in the snow. The utter vapidity makes me wish for the crazy mom and grandparents to re-appear. (They do, they do. But rather too late to salvage the film.) I also wonder why Caouette didn't reveal in the film that he'd had a kid with a girlfriend years earlier. Probably because this doesn't quite fit into the forced "My Sensitive Boyfriend Is All I Have After My Crazy Mother" theme. It would, though, have made much better film sense as part of the bigger picture of "dysfunctional family dynamics"(and been more honest, as part of a documentary).

Near the end of the film, Caouette tries hard to make us feel something by looking "sincerely" into the camera and telling us he hopes that he doesn't turn out like his mother, then wiping away a tear... He's trying desperately to be sincere, but after seeing earlier clips of his put-on antics, the effect is more schmaltzy than credible.

Caouette's actual family situation seems to have been very intense and disturbing, but again, you learn that primarily from the subtitles and not from the actual footage. He's barely been able to get anyone in his family to open up to him on camera (unless you count his mother's "pumpkin dance" near the end of the film, which seems more like anyone's unfortunate attempt to entertainingly mug for the camera rather than an example of "look at the tragedy that my mother has become"----since we've never learned what his mother was like to begin with).

The sparse actual footage of this film is put together with a lot of bells and whistles, but there's no "there" there. And certainly no family there, only an attempt at an "American Gothic" portrait that falls short due to its transparent attempts at being "hip" and convincing.

---

26 out of 39 people found the following comment useful :-
Your greatest creation is the life you lead., 3 June 2005

Author: Andy (film-critic) from Bookseller of the Blue Ridge

In the world of documentaries, Tarnation ranks among one of the best that I have seen. Sometimes with a low-budget outing it is hard to judge the quality of the final product, but Jonathan Caouette proves that he has a passion for the subject, a desire to tell his story and a know-how to bring his moments to life. With bold music (that nearly grips your heart at every turn) and an Andy Warhol style of imagery, Caouette pulls us deep within his life and shows us his life unfiltered. Using just his computer, he builds the story of his life using scenes taken from nineteen years in front (and behind) the camera. It reminded me of Capturing the Friedmans, except with more heart and soul. We are taken through a broad range of emotions which include fear, surprise, excitement, and distraught as we witness the decline of our narrator. Tarnation is a man's bold expression to tell the story of his life, and for me, it worked wonders on my soul and mind.

What makes Caouette's documentary impressive is that you sometimes forget that he is the one creating the masterpiece. Since he is in front of the camera from a young age until thirty years later, it is easy for one to forget that he is creating these images for us. I think that is important for us to remember because he places every snapshot, every audio, and every snippet of video in the film to show a purpose. While we all can watch the film and derive our purpose or point about the film (which is what makes cinema amazing), I saw it as this very sad and vicious circle of life. Mother lives with parents, who are mentally unstable, she eventually is that way as well, which then slowly translates onto her son. It is a sad and destructive cycle that happens daily in America as well as around the world. It is a central focus to many of our films and media, the idea that if you grow up in an environment of chaos, you will eventually create that same chaos years later. It is a wild thought that can be visually seen in the film Tarnation.

Outside of the broad range of emotions that were surging through me while I watched this riveting piece of art, there were some elements that I just thought were bold, creative, and extremely stylish. I loved the use of words to tell the story. Normally, in these documentaries you are forced to listen to that calming voice telling you what is happening, what did happen, and what will happen next. In this film, Caouette uses the typed words to give us both that sensation of neutrality (and sometimes numbness) and to honestly focus our attention towards the images on screen. There are times when the voice-over technique can become overpowering, and you begin to focus yourself onto the words of the narrator, instead of the events unfolding on screen. With the typed words from Caouette, we focus on him, his mother, and the environment that is imploding around him.

Also, the music. One cannot talk about this film without mentioning the soundtrack to this film. You know those moments where you need to express yourself and the only way that works is by making a mixed CD? Well, this is Caouette's mixed CD. The music choice for the film seemed to come from his heart, from his passion spawned this music. Not only was I listening to some great songs for the first time, but this was just another avenue for me to understand Jonathan and the world in which he resides. The music really help set the mood and tone for the entire film. It helped build the tension and give us that raw human emotion that built the foundation to this movie. Jonathan's mother was the main character of this film, then I would say that the music was the co-star. This film would not have been as effective if it wasn't for the amazing sound choices.

Finally, I would like to say that Caouette has built a masterpiece here. He has taken a personal story and created more emotions and personality than most Hollywood big budget productions could have. It was real. This is something that Hollywood continues to strive for, but cannot quite reach it. Caouette has, and I wouldn't be surprised if he did it again. I think what I loved so much about this film is that it is another story about our world. I don't think we see enough real-life stories about our neighbors and friends, but instead are bombarded with superficial heroes that are paid more money than we will ever see and somehow always win the perfect girl at the end. Happiness is not always the ending to every story.

Overall, I was impressed. This was an outstanding film that deserves every bit of recognition that is handed to it. Caouette has created a masterpiece and is changing with this film the face of documentaries. I expect to see rip-offs of this popping up in the near future. He inspires those of us who want to create our own stories to do so, and is a pioneer of the struggling filmmaker. I suggest this film to all my friends and family, not just for the cinematic pleasure that is contained in it, but also because Caouette could be the modern day Warhol … at least that is what I saw when I witnessed the power of this film. Wow.

Bravo Mr. Caouette, Bravo!!!

Grade: ***** out of *****

---

24 out of 36 people found the following comment useful :-
Lost in Tarnation, 17 November 2004

Author: metropeel from Paris

Tarnation is a neologism made from the words tarnished and damnation; that is also the name of a band. The trailer was disturbing and especially the tagline "this movie has saved my life". There is a lot of teenagers who are writing a diary and that is a bit surprising that this kind of movie has never be done before. I'm sure many people have made some kind of patchwork (photos, drawings, movies etc) but the work of Caouette is different. J Caouette had a plan : he wanted to be a director and this plot makes all the difference. This film is not kinky, is not defending Gay and Lesbian cause, is not a documentary about schizophrenia even if all that stuff are a part of the essence of the movie. I believe (but maybe I an wrong) that J Caouette wants to tell his own story of a boy who are fascinated by cinema. I loved this movie because many things had bounced in my heart during the screening. I am not gay, I don't want to work in the cinema business, my parents are not mentally insane but I understand the feelings of Caouette because all teenager has got pain in his heart : shame, fear, anxiety, neither an adult and a child etc. So I remembered memories of pain, tears and laughs. I remembered my own life. Tarnation is also a movie which leads hope and happiness to come. The cinematography is awesome, the music is good. Supported by Gus Van Sant and David Lynch, this movie is like a new born for the youg actor, director J Caouette. This man has got the rest of his life ahead. I think he will become a great actor/director. Go see this unique movie even if the first part of the movie is a bit violent and disturbing.

Gaël - Paris - France

my IMDb vote : 8/10

---

14 out of 18 people found the following comment useful :-
Everyone has a story to tell..., 12 November 2005

Author: moonspinner55 from redlands, ca

Super-8 auteur Jonathan Caouette, a young gay man with an extremely turbulent life, reveals his troubled childhood through home-movies and stills. The worshipful son of a beautiful ex-child model/single mother/electro-shock recipient, Caouette manages, in surprisingly linear fashion considering the circumstances, to paint a vivid portrait of the ultimate dysfunctional family. His grandparents, who ended up adopting Jonathan after his mother was jailed and he went through the horrors of the foster care system, are revealed as loving yet unconcerned older folks with perhaps a secretive, defensive side; Jonathan's mother Renee, once a striking young woman, is the sad result of "medical expertise" gone shatteringly wrong. The film is alternately assaultive, theatrical (Jonathan revealed a highly acute sense of theatricality and love for outré movies at a very young age), amusing, narcissistic, boring, compelling and, finally, quite moving. There are just as many stretches of questionable sincerity on Caouette's part as there are exhilarating moments--a joyous romp on the beach with mom or a beautiful, revealing childhood lip-synching take on "Frank Mills". The alt-rock soundtrack is superb and Caouette, a handsome, playfully schizophrenic star-in-the-making, is a talent to watch. **1/2 from ****

---

19 out of 29 people found the following comment useful :-
Self indulgent, 21 May 2005

Author: rawk_out from Canada

*** This comment may contain spoilers ***

If you are looking for a movie about Jonathon Caouettes relationship with his schizophrenic mother - you have picked up the wrong film. In essence, this is a self-indulgent documentary about narcissistic Caouette. It actually turned my stomach to watch melodramatic Caouette strut his stuff in front of the cameras. Especially the final scenes, where he is discussing how concerned he is that he will turn out like his mother and seems to actually force the tears out - then goes downstairs to lay beside her on the sofa. The entire room of people I watched this with burst out in disgusted laughter. As Frin said, "From the synopsis I thought it was supposed to be about *her*" - and we were sadly disappointed to watch a film about Jonathon and what a great actor he is and how messed up he was and how talented he is with a camera. I take no issue with the re-enactments, it's the fact that this movie was supposed to be about his MOTHER and her illness, not about how much he loves to be in front of the camera. It took a full hour of watching before there was a scene of his mother that lasted longer than 30 seconds. I expected to be affected by this movie, but it has no emotional impact. If you are looking for a doc about troubled family relationships, try "My Flesh and Blood" or "Brother's Keeper" instead.

---

12 out of 17 people found the following comment useful :-
Why should we believe in this movie?, 23 February 2005

Author: javillol from Mexico

*** This comment may contain spoilers ***

And I mean Believe, with capital B.

SPOLERS

By watching the first scene, I already hated the movie. His boyfriend arrives home. He "wakes him up". Why is the camera there? Why is there enough light to shoot the situation? Why are there microphones? Needless to say, if there weren't any of the three, we could simply not watch the scene. Two minutes had passed and I had enough. The movie is just not honest (why is he filming himself when he calls to the hospital?). It is just a cry out loud for indulgence. And they are making money out of that. Out of that, and out of the hundred of images of his mother and his grandparents. Just not honest.

I had the chance to ask Gus Van Sant (producer of this film) in a film festival why he casted non Spanish speaking, US actors to play the role of non English speaking - just arrived to the States Mexicans in his first film, Mala Noche. He said he didn't care at the time. Same thing here, they don't care to mix what it is produced to what it is real (as if we were in some kind of Truman Show). I am sorry for your life, Mr. Director, but I don't care for seeing portrayed in such a non honest way in a movie.

I coulnd't stop thinking about "Capturing the Friedmans". That's a great movie! And 100% Asia Argento's "The Heart is deceiving..." is much more brutal, and much more serious as a film than this made-to-cry- film experiment

---

14 out of 22 people found the following comment useful :-
self-indulgent and overwrought, 23 April 2005

Author: huggebear from Silver Spring, MD

*** This comment may contain spoilers ***

This film contains the self-indulgent meanderings of a young filmmaker (Couette) who can't seem to come to terms with the pain and difficulty his mother's mental illnesses inflicted upon his childhood and adolescence. This movie forces the filmmaker's need for catharsis on the viewer, and Couette manages to blatantly exploit his family in the process. His mother--who was in and out of mental hospitals and treated for various psychiatric disorders during the time period the film depicts--comes off as a victim of over-diagnosis, her conditions apparently only manifesting AFTER her parents put her into treatment. His grandparents--who raised Couette when his mother was unable to care for him--are the villains who forced both Renee (Couette's mother) and Couette into psychiatric treatment (although Couette had been exhibiting suicidal behavior, but this is apparently not the point).

Couette seems to blame the problems of his entire life on his "dysfunctional" family, and rather than come to terms with the pain of his childhood, he showcases the demons of his family for the world. The heavily stylized (read: overly arty and amateurish) camera work and the apparent lack of editing (many of the home movie sequences drag on entirely too long) were distracting, but not nearly so offensive as Couette's need to eviscerate his family.

TERRIBLE!

---

11 out of 18 people found the following comment useful :-
Truly inspirational, 1 March 2005

Author: bonadea_36 from Turkey

First of all, I may accept some negative comments about this movie but one should admit that Tarnation was truly inspirational. It was like reading someone's diary, but it was on screen. It is kind of strange that no one has ever thought about this, but then again many people are not obsessed with camera and movies as Jonathan is. Whether you like Tarnation or not it is definite that it was unique, nothing I've ever seen on the screen. A film, a documentary, a diary, a poem to Jonathan's mother, a short look at the lives of teenagers during the 90's and most importantly a look at someone real, so real that you may have passed by him on the street. What effected me the most was that he is real. He is among us, he can even be your friend's friend. Seeing so closely how someone suffer was a great experience. I also think that this movie has created something none has ever done before. And it also reminded me that movies are all about life, whether they are fiction or non-fiction. Every character we see in movies may be real characters in life. The characters may have been fictional in Tarnation, but they are not. So this fact increased my love for the art of cinema and inspired me to continue shooting my short films. I have to thank him.

---

6 out of 9 people found the following comment useful :-
An exercise in extreme narcissism., 18 March 2006

Author: runrunnp from United States

*** This comment may contain spoilers ***

I sat through the first hour of this movie and I could watch no more. What you find out is his grandparents are slightly cuckoo and boring. His mother is really cuckoo which may or may not have been because her parents were abusive and that she received extremely harsh psychiatric treatment. The film maker is really narcissistic treating the viewer to long sections where he performs (when a young teenage boy) for the camera as some female with Southern affectation which I guess is based on some famous performer or something but which is really lost on me. His grandmother (and himself?) terms these mini performances "confessions" which I guess has some analogy to the film presented - is this his grown version of the "confessions" he performed earlier. I don't know because the first hour is not only harrowing but boring and emotionally un-involving. The real story is told using text which appears across the screen over images which I suppose relate but often unintelligibly. I would like to see this story but I would want to see it told with some honest humanity and not wrapped up in posturing and affectation.

---

---

Page 1 of 11:

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]

Add another comment

---

Related Links

Plot summary	Ratings	Awards
Newsgroup reviews	External reviews	Official site
Plot keywords	Main details	Your user comments
Your vote history