IMDb >
Shooting Gallery (2005) (V)
Watch It
Buy it at Amazon
Rent it at blockbuster.com
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
BETA
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsShooting Gallery (2005) (V) More at IMDbPro »
| Videos |
Overview
User Rating:
Release Date:
27 December 2005 (USA) moreGenre:
ThrillerTagline:
There's no such thing as luck to a hustler.Plot:
A street-smart pool player falls in with a pack of hustlers. As he rises in the underground circuit, he lands in the middle of a match between his boss and a crooked cop. | add synopsisUser Comments:
ridiculously stupid. moreCast
(Cast overview, first billed only)| Ving Rhames | ... | Cue Ball Carl Bridgers | |
| Roselyn Sanchez | ... | Jezebel Black | |
| Daniel Newman | ... | Easy | |
| Freddie Prinze Jr. | ... | Jericho Hudson | |
| Callum Keith Rennie | ... | Michael Mortensen | |
| Angus Macfadyen | ... | Tenderloin Tony | |
| Devon Sawa | ... | Paul The Pawn | |
| Dan Bell | ... | Nickles | |
| Jon Eyez | ... | Mad Boy | |
| Mark Krasnoff | ... | Larry | |
| Robert Pralgo | ... | Robert Hudson (as Rob Pralgo) | |
| Leicester Landon | ... | Janna | |
| Jeffrey Huth | ... | Tonight Show Ted | |
| Bill Romanowski | ... | Case | |
| Phi-Long Nguyen | ... | Jaime |
Additional Details
MPAA:
Rated R for violence, some strong sexuality, nudity, language and drug use.Parents Guide:
Add content advisory for parentsRuntime:
102 minCountry:
USALanguage:
EnglishColor:
ColorFun Stuff
Soundtrack:
Dead Man moreFAQ
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.more
Message Boards
Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for Shooting Gallery (2005) (V)| Recent Posts (updated daily) | User |
|---|---|
| CKR | ohbyjingo |
| Roselyn Sanches nude?? | tyshug20 |
| True Romance ending? | slybecker |
| Soundtrack... | ladyXtreme |
| To set the record straight | conrad-13 |
| Dude at laundrymat | kywise |
Recommendations
If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
Show more recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
| The Air I Breathe | Romeo Must Die | The Proposal | Magnum Force | Rush Hour 2 |
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
Related Links
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| News articles | IMDb Thriller section | IMDb USA section |
| Add this title to MyMovies |



I'm a fan of poolhall junkies. i loved PJ because everything flowed and the shots were awesome. PJ wasn't so focused on hustling and an obvious fantasy plot line. PJ showed a range of pool players and the community. The kids who get punked, hustlers, pro players, and everything in between.
This movie on the other hand was so made up. The director even mentions a few of the lingo used was made up. SG had too much lingo if you asked me. All the clutter messed up the dialogue. Normal people in pool halls do not talk like that and I have been in plenty. So who the hell was the writer trying to target? Cuz I am sure there is only a small population of the nation that can understand everything these kids are blabbering about. And why have 8-ball signature logos when everyone knows the game is 9 ball. The 8-ball has no significance to the movie.
Bottom line, the director has no concept of what is true to real-life and what is just made up. this movie is like a report with a whole lot of footnotes, but none of the sources are relevant to the point.