7 out of 7 people found the following comment useful :- Awesome fight choreography! Why do so many people hate this?, 17 January 2004
Author:
Andrew Hernandez (jackyvoe@yahoo.com) from Phoenix, AZ
I'm surprised at the number of people who have bashed this movie to pieces.
They base their opinions off of logic too, which is completely inappropriate
for this type of movie. Yes, the script is badly written, there are a lot of
factual errors, this isn't an accurate portrayal of SEAL type stuff, yes all
that is obvious.
The reason why this movie exists is to present Hong Kong style action to
America. Former Jackie Chan Stunt Team member, Andy Cheng designs some of
the best fight scenes in recent years. While CHARLIE'S ANGELS: FULL
THROTTLE, TOMB RAIDER 2, and THE MUSKETEER suffer from having no sense of
action, US SEALS knows how to deliver the goods. It's interesting to note
how a lot of weapon-work was employed in the action scenes. I was expecting
more hand to hand style combat. The movie takes a while to get going, but
the fights are well worth waiting for. Especially in a scene where the good
guys are confronted by 100 henchmen, and have to fight all of them off. It
was reminiscent of the big action sequence in TAI-CHI MASTER
(1993).
The director Issac Florentine is one of the few people working in the video
market who does a good job. Unlike a lot of other directors, he takes pride
in his job, and does his best to make cool movies. (COLD HARVEST and SPECIAL
FORCES)
It's safe to say though, that this movie is only meant for people who like
lots of cool action. Everyone else is better off staying
away.
5 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :- The Best Cheesy Movie Ever, 20 February 2004
Author:
vrrc from Transhutolia
This movie is no where near as terrible as everyone else makes it out to
be.
The dialogue is indeed terrible, as are many of the lines. The plot is
somewhat silly, and the acting ranges from mediocre to corny. All this
and
more make this a movie worth watching.
The opening scene is an absurdly funny gun fight (whether or not it was
meant to be) including a guy pulling a bazooka out of no where to kill
someone for a 3rd time. Also present in this scene are needless
backflips,
and the overused wooshing noise that gives this movie character.
The whoosing noise was most definetly added in in jest; no director would
ever think it serious to have a woosh when someone nods their head, and
the
overuse of this is hillarious.
Most of the movie takes place on an island where one spark would cause a
giant explosion, so they fight with swords and the like. Yes, the swords
would create sparks that would cause an explosion, but they had to set it
up
somehow so that the melee scenes could make sense.
And the fighting is some of the best seen in a while, with weapons ranging
from chains, an acidic paintball gun, and a scarf. How many movies do you
see where someone actually gets beaten up with a scarf that goes
"woosh?"
Not a film for those who like to think deeply into everything they see, US
Seals II is nothing more than a Western Hong Kong film, whose plot mostly
serves no more purpose than to provide a catalyst to bring on the amazing
fight scenes.
And as every single other review points out, the main bad guy did indeed
have a cigar in his mouth while in an island that any spark would blow
everything up. What every other review does not point out is the fact
that
the cigar is not lit.
2 out of 2 people found the following comment useful :- Watch with beer and friends only, 22 March 2003
Author:
Steven Peters (sp42) from Canterbury, Kent England
Ok lets start with the obvious, this movie is bad. Awful script, awful
acting, unbelievably atrocious dialogue, budget the size of a car
insurance
advert and you could go on and on about how awful the film is.... but you
would be wrong.
Just like a nugget of gold wrapped in layers and layers .... and layers of
mud, get beneath the surface (really far beneath the surface)there is
treasure to be found.
Lets start with the premise which is just an excellent excuse for some
martial arts action. Ok ridiculously insane and evil bad guy has nukes and
where is he launching them from? an island where the nuclear fallout of a
past conflict would make a single gunshot ignite the whole island. (I am
sure there is a reason why launching the nukes won't but I can't
remember).
So good guy puts together a crack squad of martial arts experts with dodgy
pasts and different weapon specialities and prepares to kick ass. The film
quickly reaches high octane stupidness, with hundreds of people battling
it
out in surprisingly well choreographed fight scenes.
The complete over the topness of the film gives it an infectious fun feel,
a
film which is the equivalent to a whole day spent in the pub with your
best
mates. This film is incredibly funny. Regardless of action taken a huge
swishing noise accompanies it. I need to adjust my glasses (swish), I am
going stand up (swish swish), I am walking (swish swish swish swish). The
dialogue is hilarious and the fight scenes are sometimes outrageously
funny,
especially the closing fight scenes which are over the top brilliance.
Sure
its all unintentional funniness but its still funny.
Yes over the top martial arts violence, strippers and swearing. This is an
excellent example of must watch with beer and mates category of action
films.
In short its not big, its certainly not clever, in fact its not even any
good. It deserves 2 or 3 it gets hmm 7.
1 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :- Best worst movie ever--AND makes a great drinking game, 20 August 2006
Author:
kim_015 from United States
Def worth either a 10, or a 1... because you either love or hate this
movie. I really wonder if the directors/actors/sound effects guy were
actually trying to make a god-awful movie or not, but if they did they
succeeded cause its just sooo bad its good. I rented it for my
boyfriend and his roommates, and we all sat around laughing
hysterically and drinking for every fake "whoosh" added in... They just
couldn't get over the impaling/"its OK, i'm fine" scene or the scene
where a guy gets shot and does a back somersault into a boat. Def had
the best "oh-my-god,-did-they-just-really-do-that" ending ever in the
history of movies. Bottome line-- don't watch if you actually wanna
watch a good movie, but watch if you feel like a good laugh.
1 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :- Won't you take me on a sea cruise..., 3 August 2006
Author:
Frank Markland from United States
US Seals II stars Michael Worth as as a commando who uses his martial
arts skills to take on a former marine/martial arts expert(Chapa) who
has taken a scientist hostage (Notice how the scientist is a sexy chick
who looks more like a kindergarten teacher than a scientist, with big
boobs, no less) so that she can help him turn a missile nuclear however
the catch is that there is so much flammable air that one cannot light
a cigarette let alone fire a gun (Or for that matter a nuclear missile)
so Worth gathers a gang of martial artists as well as Marhall Teague
(The film's best character) who is armed with acid paintball guns
(Thinking about this movie logically will get you nowhere) and to which
the seals take on the terrorists with martial arts battles. I actually
probably wouldn't have reviewed this had I not clicked on "Michael
Worth" and had seen that he was in this, which I had subsequently
caught on HBO (Or Showtime, or something...) I remember enjoying the
action sequences as well as the stupidity here. Indeed U.S Seals II is
so silly it makes Issac Florentine's other efforts i've seen (Desert
Kickboxer, Cold Harvest and Bridge Of Dragons) seem like works of
supreme intelligence. The movie is full of plot holes, it is reported
that you can't shoot guns but this doesn't stop our villain from
smoking or launching a nuke. Worst of all is when the film tries to
concern itself with characters, who don't register anything towards
reality. (Teague's character aside) still it has lots of action and it
has tons of carnage, so in other words this is perfect for the action
fan looking for a guilty pleasure but little else. I haven't seen any
of the other U.S Seals movies but despite enjoying this goofy entry, I
still doubt i'll be seeking these out.
* * out of 4-(Fair)
1 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :- Power Rangers, 3 November 2004
Author:
youradf from US
Watching the movie, I thought I was watching an episode of Power
Rangers, and saw the comment asking the same thing. Maybe it's because
Sophia was actually a stunt double for the Pink Power Ranger-
Seemed like the Power Rangers, unmasked... caricature of characters,
with the action elevated to HK style levels. I took the whoosh whoosh
as a parody of the usual action flicks, and can't imagine anyone
expecting it was to be taken seriously. Saw an on air broadcast, so I
imagine much of the stuff was clipped; didn't see any nudity,
gratuitous or otherwise, and maybe where the bad guy got cleaved. Now
why he didn't just jump off the ride; hmm?
1 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :- An OK movie, 6 September 2003
Author:
Hanz (gano27)
This was a GREAT martial arts movie, but there was nothing new (the same
old
hollywood action story). The storry suxed and most irrittating of all was
the stupid "woosh" sounds when they moved.
So if you want to watch a film with awsome fighting, this is the
one.
And if you want to watch a realistic movie under the same concept see Navy
Seals.
2 out of 3 people found the following comment useful :- Damian Chapa only thing worth watching, 5 February 2005
Author:
joana smith from united states
Well it wasn't bad in a sense of the fighting, actually the fighting is
well done. The English girl and the bad guy Damian Chapa where the only
thing worth watching.
Actually Damian Chapa had a great performance as the bad guy however
the rest of the actors where kind of boring. Although I kind of liked
the Asian guy was goodlooking.
I hated the swooshing sounds they where so stupid actually if they
where not there it would have been OK.
shot well and good sword fights.
J.S.
2 out of 3 people found the following comment useful :- One Of the Best Hong Kong-Hollywood Crossovers, 8 December 2001
Author:
BOB AUDET (msaudie2003@yahoo.com) from Maplewood NJ
US SEALS 2 is a far cry from its predecessor and delivers a surprisingly
witty script, and pays homage to more than a few classic movies. The
setting
of a Russian island surrounded by methane-gas (precluding the use of
gunfire) is reminiscent of "Enter the Dragon" as in the fact that the
ex-SEAL turned terrorist (Chapa) surrounds himself with a martial arts
army.
It is up to his team leader (Worth) and a group of martial artists whom he
puts together to stop Ratliffe and his army before they can destroy a major
city. Throw in a few plotpoints akin to "The Rock", a little bit of "Broken
Arrow", a great and very talented crew and you have a pure bit of
enjoyment.
If you're looking for a Navy SEALs movie, that is, Special Forces navy
SEALs - this is not one! Well, the forces in this movie indeed are
special but they're not SEALs. With all the 'whoosh' sounds every 5
seconds, heaps of backflips and cold weapons this can never be what the
title says. If you're into kung-fu you can check this one out,
otherwise, with no special tactics, no M4s, no MP5s - thumbs down. Plot
is predictable as is acting. Blood is very sparse considering how much
slashing there is (once in a while on knife and katana) and the
intensity of characters jumping about when shot is just so naive. Not
less naive is the last killing scene when two main characters slash the
main bad guy with katana in half. The only thing that kept reminding me
this is not a complete kung-fu movie were the guys in military uniforms
at the headquarters. If you want action and SEALs, I recommend Behind
Enemy Lines 2.
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
U.S. Seals II (2001) (V)
7 out of 7 people found the following comment useful :-

Awesome fight choreography! Why do so many people hate this?, 17 January 2004
Author: Andrew Hernandez (jackyvoe@yahoo.com) from Phoenix, AZ
I'm surprised at the number of people who have bashed this movie to pieces. They base their opinions off of logic too, which is completely inappropriate for this type of movie. Yes, the script is badly written, there are a lot of factual errors, this isn't an accurate portrayal of SEAL type stuff, yes all that is obvious.
The reason why this movie exists is to present Hong Kong style action to America. Former Jackie Chan Stunt Team member, Andy Cheng designs some of the best fight scenes in recent years. While CHARLIE'S ANGELS: FULL THROTTLE, TOMB RAIDER 2, and THE MUSKETEER suffer from having no sense of action, US SEALS knows how to deliver the goods. It's interesting to note how a lot of weapon-work was employed in the action scenes. I was expecting more hand to hand style combat. The movie takes a while to get going, but the fights are well worth waiting for. Especially in a scene where the good guys are confronted by 100 henchmen, and have to fight all of them off. It was reminiscent of the big action sequence in TAI-CHI MASTER (1993).
The director Issac Florentine is one of the few people working in the video market who does a good job. Unlike a lot of other directors, he takes pride in his job, and does his best to make cool movies. (COLD HARVEST and SPECIAL FORCES)
It's safe to say though, that this movie is only meant for people who like lots of cool action. Everyone else is better off staying away.
5 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :-
The Best Cheesy Movie Ever, 20 February 2004
Author: vrrc from Transhutolia
This movie is no where near as terrible as everyone else makes it out to be.
The dialogue is indeed terrible, as are many of the lines. The plot is somewhat silly, and the acting ranges from mediocre to corny. All this and more make this a movie worth watching.
The opening scene is an absurdly funny gun fight (whether or not it was meant to be) including a guy pulling a bazooka out of no where to kill someone for a 3rd time. Also present in this scene are needless backflips, and the overused wooshing noise that gives this movie character.
The whoosing noise was most definetly added in in jest; no director would ever think it serious to have a woosh when someone nods their head, and the overuse of this is hillarious.
Most of the movie takes place on an island where one spark would cause a giant explosion, so they fight with swords and the like. Yes, the swords would create sparks that would cause an explosion, but they had to set it up somehow so that the melee scenes could make sense.
And the fighting is some of the best seen in a while, with weapons ranging from chains, an acidic paintball gun, and a scarf. How many movies do you see where someone actually gets beaten up with a scarf that goes "woosh?"
Not a film for those who like to think deeply into everything they see, US Seals II is nothing more than a Western Hong Kong film, whose plot mostly serves no more purpose than to provide a catalyst to bring on the amazing fight scenes.
And as every single other review points out, the main bad guy did indeed have a cigar in his mouth while in an island that any spark would blow everything up. What every other review does not point out is the fact that the cigar is not lit.
2 out of 2 people found the following comment useful :-
Watch with beer and friends only, 22 March 2003
Author: Steven Peters (sp42) from Canterbury, Kent England
Ok lets start with the obvious, this movie is bad. Awful script, awful acting, unbelievably atrocious dialogue, budget the size of a car insurance advert and you could go on and on about how awful the film is.... but you would be wrong.
Just like a nugget of gold wrapped in layers and layers .... and layers of mud, get beneath the surface (really far beneath the surface)there is treasure to be found.
Lets start with the premise which is just an excellent excuse for some martial arts action. Ok ridiculously insane and evil bad guy has nukes and where is he launching them from? an island where the nuclear fallout of a past conflict would make a single gunshot ignite the whole island. (I am sure there is a reason why launching the nukes won't but I can't remember). So good guy puts together a crack squad of martial arts experts with dodgy pasts and different weapon specialities and prepares to kick ass. The film quickly reaches high octane stupidness, with hundreds of people battling it out in surprisingly well choreographed fight scenes.
The complete over the topness of the film gives it an infectious fun feel, a film which is the equivalent to a whole day spent in the pub with your best mates. This film is incredibly funny. Regardless of action taken a huge swishing noise accompanies it. I need to adjust my glasses (swish), I am going stand up (swish swish), I am walking (swish swish swish swish). The dialogue is hilarious and the fight scenes are sometimes outrageously funny, especially the closing fight scenes which are over the top brilliance. Sure its all unintentional funniness but its still funny.
Yes over the top martial arts violence, strippers and swearing. This is an excellent example of must watch with beer and mates category of action films.
In short its not big, its certainly not clever, in fact its not even any good. It deserves 2 or 3 it gets hmm 7.
1 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :-

Best worst movie ever--AND makes a great drinking game, 20 August 2006
Author: kim_015 from United States
Def worth either a 10, or a 1... because you either love or hate this movie. I really wonder if the directors/actors/sound effects guy were actually trying to make a god-awful movie or not, but if they did they succeeded cause its just sooo bad its good. I rented it for my boyfriend and his roommates, and we all sat around laughing hysterically and drinking for every fake "whoosh" added in... They just couldn't get over the impaling/"its OK, i'm fine" scene or the scene where a guy gets shot and does a back somersault into a boat. Def had the best "oh-my-god,-did-they-just-really-do-that" ending ever in the history of movies. Bottome line-- don't watch if you actually wanna watch a good movie, but watch if you feel like a good laugh.
1 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :-

Won't you take me on a sea cruise..., 3 August 2006
Author: Frank Markland from United States
US Seals II stars Michael Worth as as a commando who uses his martial arts skills to take on a former marine/martial arts expert(Chapa) who has taken a scientist hostage (Notice how the scientist is a sexy chick who looks more like a kindergarten teacher than a scientist, with big boobs, no less) so that she can help him turn a missile nuclear however the catch is that there is so much flammable air that one cannot light a cigarette let alone fire a gun (Or for that matter a nuclear missile) so Worth gathers a gang of martial artists as well as Marhall Teague (The film's best character) who is armed with acid paintball guns (Thinking about this movie logically will get you nowhere) and to which the seals take on the terrorists with martial arts battles. I actually probably wouldn't have reviewed this had I not clicked on "Michael Worth" and had seen that he was in this, which I had subsequently caught on HBO (Or Showtime, or something...) I remember enjoying the action sequences as well as the stupidity here. Indeed U.S Seals II is so silly it makes Issac Florentine's other efforts i've seen (Desert Kickboxer, Cold Harvest and Bridge Of Dragons) seem like works of supreme intelligence. The movie is full of plot holes, it is reported that you can't shoot guns but this doesn't stop our villain from smoking or launching a nuke. Worst of all is when the film tries to concern itself with characters, who don't register anything towards reality. (Teague's character aside) still it has lots of action and it has tons of carnage, so in other words this is perfect for the action fan looking for a guilty pleasure but little else. I haven't seen any of the other U.S Seals movies but despite enjoying this goofy entry, I still doubt i'll be seeking these out.
* * out of 4-(Fair)
1 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :-
Power Rangers, 3 November 2004
Author: youradf from US
Watching the movie, I thought I was watching an episode of Power Rangers, and saw the comment asking the same thing. Maybe it's because Sophia was actually a stunt double for the Pink Power Ranger-
Seemed like the Power Rangers, unmasked... caricature of characters, with the action elevated to HK style levels. I took the whoosh whoosh as a parody of the usual action flicks, and can't imagine anyone expecting it was to be taken seriously. Saw an on air broadcast, so I imagine much of the stuff was clipped; didn't see any nudity, gratuitous or otherwise, and maybe where the bad guy got cleaved. Now why he didn't just jump off the ride; hmm?
1 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :-

An OK movie, 6 September 2003
Author: Hanz (gano27)
This was a GREAT martial arts movie, but there was nothing new (the same old hollywood action story). The storry suxed and most irrittating of all was the stupid "woosh" sounds when they moved. So if you want to watch a film with awsome fighting, this is the one. And if you want to watch a realistic movie under the same concept see Navy Seals.
2 out of 3 people found the following comment useful :-

Damian Chapa only thing worth watching, 5 February 2005
Author: joana smith from united states
Well it wasn't bad in a sense of the fighting, actually the fighting is well done. The English girl and the bad guy Damian Chapa where the only thing worth watching.
Actually Damian Chapa had a great performance as the bad guy however the rest of the actors where kind of boring. Although I kind of liked the Asian guy was goodlooking.
I hated the swooshing sounds they where so stupid actually if they where not there it would have been OK.
shot well and good sword fights.
J.S.
2 out of 3 people found the following comment useful :-

One Of the Best Hong Kong-Hollywood Crossovers, 8 December 2001
Author: BOB AUDET (msaudie2003@yahoo.com) from Maplewood NJ
US SEALS 2 is a far cry from its predecessor and delivers a surprisingly witty script, and pays homage to more than a few classic movies. The setting of a Russian island surrounded by methane-gas (precluding the use of gunfire) is reminiscent of "Enter the Dragon" as in the fact that the ex-SEAL turned terrorist (Chapa) surrounds himself with a martial arts army. It is up to his team leader (Worth) and a group of martial artists whom he puts together to stop Ratliffe and his army before they can destroy a major city. Throw in a few plotpoints akin to "The Rock", a little bit of "Broken Arrow", a great and very talented crew and you have a pure bit of enjoyment.
Not really a SEALs movie, 19 February 2008
Author: Dragan Prlic (delta-18@net.hr) from Croatia
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
If you're looking for a Navy SEALs movie, that is, Special Forces navy SEALs - this is not one! Well, the forces in this movie indeed are special but they're not SEALs. With all the 'whoosh' sounds every 5 seconds, heaps of backflips and cold weapons this can never be what the title says. If you're into kung-fu you can check this one out, otherwise, with no special tactics, no M4s, no MP5s - thumbs down. Plot is predictable as is acting. Blood is very sparse considering how much slashing there is (once in a while on knife and katana) and the intensity of characters jumping about when shot is just so naive. Not less naive is the last killing scene when two main characters slash the main bad guy with katana in half. The only thing that kept reminding me this is not a complete kung-fu movie were the guys in military uniforms at the headquarters. If you want action and SEALs, I recommend Behind Enemy Lines 2.
Add another comment
Related Links