Home
search
more | tips

Main Boards | Help | Terms & Conditions
New User | Log In
IMDbPro Message Boards

You love movies and TV. You're a great software developer. So remind me why you aren't working at IMDb.com?

Board: Western


12

Subject Posted by Date    
The Alamo (2004) - Yay or Nay?
  by Memovox64   (Sun May 18 2008 20:20:50)
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
UPDATED Sun May 18 2008 20:28:36

I say "Yay". The critical savaging of The Alamo epic was grossly unfair and perhaps an indication of the immaturity and short attention span of today's movie critics and audiences.

I didn't mind the long build-up to the excellent battle sequences. Quaid was powerful as Sam Houston, Thornton was likeable in a tender characterization of David (Davey)Crockett and Jason Patric's Jim Bowie was hard as his steel knife. Patrick Wilson did his best as Colonel Travis -I don't know how old the real Colonel Travis was in 1836 or what his personality was like- but the role would've been better suited to an older actor.

The Alamo's long, detail and character-driven prelude was a risky decision by the director, but pays off with repeat viewings of the film. A director's cut would be even better.

Remember the Alamo!

tv & film votes http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=9422378

Re: The Alamo (2004) - Yay or Nay? HighPlainsBapster   (Mon May 19 2008 05:46:13)
Re: The Alamo (2004) - Yay or Nay? Samoan Bob   (Mon May 19 2008 17:34:15)
Re: The Alamo (2004) - Yay or Nay? Memovox64   (Mon May 19 2008 18:42:12)
Re: The Alamo (2004) - Yay or Nay? sgtsaunders   (Tue May 20 2008 10:44:56)
Re: The Alamo (2004) - Yay or Nay? Readerman   (Mon May 19 2008 15:48:35)
Re: The Alamo (2004) - Yay or Nay? Markle-3   (Mon May 19 2008 17:45:34)
Re: The Alamo (2004) - Yay or Nay? Blaise_B   (Wed May 21 2008 13:01:11)
Re: The Alamo (2004) - Yay or Nay? ScarletPimpernel64   (Sat Jun 14 2008 08:31:34)
Re: The Alamo (2004) - Yay or Nay? MikeF-6   (Tue Jun 17 2008 17:06:17)


12

 
 


Back to the top